|
|
What's the difference between OSPF link authentication and area authentication? |
| Author: Anthony Sequeira
Date: 2005-01-09 01:18 -600 To: Cisco certification
Subject: Goodbye area x authentication command???? ip ospf authentication ip ospf authentication-key ciscoType 2 Example: ip ospf authentication message-digest ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 cisco I am thinking about making these methods my new best practices - I found it more quick to configure this way - and I also found that it eliminated the need for additional manipulation of virtual links...... Comments?????
One potential issue that I see is that if Cisco says in the lab that
you must authenticate in area 0 - and you do it using this method -
and you have virtual links - you are not truly meeting the requirement
since there is not authentication on the virtual link which is part of
area 0.
| |
| Author: alsontra@hotmail.com Date: 2005-01-08 23:57 -600 To: 'Rick', 'Anthony Sequeira', 'Cisco certification' Subject: RE: Goodbye area x authentication command????
What you are talking about is called link authentication and should be used
when you need to authenticate a peer. The other method you're talking about
is called Area authentication and should be used when you're asked to secure
an area. router ospf 100 area 0 authentication (clear text) interface s0/0 ip ospf authentication-key cisco (clear text)Virtual-link: router ospf 100
* area 0 authentication (clear text)
Link Authentication Cleat text -
interface s0/0
ip ospf authentication
ip ospf authentication-key cisco (clear text)
The "best practices" for these types of question is to use the context of
the question to determine what type of authentication is being asked for.
| |
| [Append to This Answer] |
| Previous: |
|
| Next: |
|
| ||||||||